This drawing will help explain my conventions for naming parts
of the linkage:
Then, for each balanced leg pair, build:
Print summary, for each "half" assembly :
convert -remap orbit00.png -crop 768x512+100+120 +repage orbit44.png cropped44.png
The -remap tells convert to use the 8-bit colormap from the first frame,
and +repage is necessary to force the image to resize, not just set
stuff outside the crop area to "unused".
To create an animated gif, delay betwee frames is in 1/100ths of a second:
convert -delay 20 cropped??.png cropped.gif
Another popular walking linkage is the Klann linkage.
A Klann linkage was described in a manner similar to the method used to characterize the Jansen linkage above, and animated. The dimensions recovered from the patent seem to be sub-optimal in several ways, but the measurements have many round numbers and seem very symetric, as if they were designed by a human, and not (yet) optimized by a computer.
I wrote an optimizer for the Klann linkage, and it yielded this walking cycle. It is possible that the optimizer got "stuck" around an edge case where the rocker-bar is flat. It is possible that one could do better with more work to stay farther away from this edge case. The bottom of the foot path is not as flat as I'd like to see. Fixing the flat bar, or adding more weight to flattness of the "active" part of the cycle might help.
After tweaking the quality metric, for a flatter step, and preventing the tip of the leg from crossing the Y axis, I got a more reasonable cycle, using these parameters (origin at A):
Bx = -36.6771 By = -11.8165
Dx = -11.6454 Dy = 45.3425
AC = 17.5
BH = 24.6959
CF = 70.1769
CH = 39.8880
DE = 32.5176
EF = 53.7343
EG = 110.0125
FG = 57.1142
FH = 31.2540
After tweaking the metric more, and more optimizations, I got:
_Bx = -34.7326; _By = -14.1046;
_Dx = -11.9342; _Dy = 46.6916;
_AC=17.5000;
_BH=27.0449;
_CF=70.9096;
_CH=41.2391;
_DE=36.0792;
_EF=54.2367;
_EG=113.0327;
_FG=58.8777;
_FH=29.7236;
With this orbit.
After more work on the metric for Jansen, I re-ran Klann, and
is now my preferred geometry,
AC=17.5;
Bx=-38.8; By=-12.5;
Dx=-14.6; Dy=41.9;
BH=23.7;
CF=73.4;
CH=38.8;
DE=34.1;
EF=57.7;
EG=111.7;
FG=59;
FH=35.2;
with this orbit.
I worry that this linkage is just not as smooth (torque ripple)
as Jansen.
It looks to me like we are at some extreme geometry at some
parts of the orbit, where the ground forces on a moving mass
will not do much to help keep the crank rotating.
(Nearly parallel forces, little vector in the direction
helping crank rotation)
Building parts (Klann)
Some simple (non-braced)
parts have been drawn
for 3D printing.
The complete (non-braced) assembly has 7 unique parts.
The leg and rocker-bar can be re-used on each side
by flipping them over.
You can type make klann to generate these
parts from openscad.
For each half-assembly (one leg pair, sharing a crank), print:
Amanda Ghassaei published a swell paper from Pamona College in 2011.
She designed a linkage, which is shown
here for completeness.
Something must be amiss, since her paper does not have this tilt in
the footpath.
I could fix it by optimization, but I have not (yet) done that since
this linkage is not under serious consideration for my project.
Last modified: Wed May 15 12:19:34 MDT 2013